![]() |
|
Diagnosis
Myofascial Pain (Trigger point referring to tooth # 21 replicating the pain complaint.)
The key elements of this case are:
The Mechanism of Myofascial Pain
Myofascial pain is a controversial topic in the medical community. Due to the ecomony of Nature, one would expect that no matter what organ system is involved, basic pain mechanisms would be similar and involve similar neurotransmitters and receptors with some local variability. If this is the case, then myofascial pain should be explainable in terms of now accepted pathways for neuropathic and neurovascular pain. The neuroscience of myofascial pain is very sketchy and loosely defined. Efforts have been made to identify and characterize myofascial trigger points without clear and consistent results. Pain referral mechanisms have been proposed that suggest mechanisms not consistent with known or accepted neuropathological mechanisms. This is a major reason why the Travell concepts of myofascial pain are not widely accepted in medicine. If we were to consider myofascial pain as a peripheral sensitization of nociceptors in muscle tissue, we could explain many of the characteristics of myofascial pain using known mechanisms of neuropathic pain. David Simons suggested a mechanism that came closer to the accepted pain mechanisms when he postulated that trigger points caused central sensitization. He suggested the following diagram in a 1994 paper: ![]()
In this diagram, Simons suggests that the triggerpoint causes release of substance P (SP) in the dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis for the muscles of mastication). The SP causes adjacent second order neurons to become sensitized and fire spontaneously ( the referral site pain such as tooth #21 in this case). Additionally, he postulates that there are previously uncovered interneuron connections to the adjacent sites that also become active and release SP, further increasing the central sensitization.
Current concepts of neurogenic and neuropathic pain suggest that pain fibers (small diameter unmyelinated nociceptors) release neurotransmitters both peripherally and centrally when activated. The mechanisms of peripheral sensitization are suggested in the following diagram: ![]()
The diagram shows SP and it should be appreciated that calcitonin gene related peptide is also being released. Additionally, bradykinin is being released into the inflammatory soup around the nociceptor. If the nociceptor of this diagram is within the muscle tissue and releasing or modulating release of the pain mediators such as Histamine, bradykinin, 5HT, SP, CGRP , a local inflammatory response would be expected in the muscle tissue. This would be characterized by:
Peripheral sensitization leads to central sensitization. This is due to the ongoing central release of SP (as suggested by Simons), and Glutamate from the nociceptors. We now understand that glutamate activates the NMDA receptors on second order neurons in the TNC. When this occurs, there are a number of physiological responses that occur including further expansion of the peripheral receptive fields (referral site from the sensitized nociceptor?), lowered threshold to more pain, increased spontaneous activity, and prolonged afterdischarge, wind-up. Doesn't this sound like myofascial pain? Questions to be answered by residents:
Bibliography
Case Submitted by :
Robert L. Merrill, DDS, MS |